Subjective Doxing

 Subjective Doxing (some of the personal information here has expired as it is no longer available as personally true)

Read with eyes When a person(s) subjectively attacks another to gain information, with consent or without, it and implicative of any situation it comes across as a stolen info, if that person befriends the idea that the person(s) are acting out of details that defeats another at holding or withholding their own details (i.e. PERSONAL, ID#, SSN, BANK (redact information to prevent a person from reading without eyes only), etc.).

 Absolutely, doxing is theft of info, for reasons a person perverts details is psychologically pathological and will always post a problem, they normally release this information to gain anonymous favor amongst peers and other forms of social hierarchy but will always be criminals in libel, slander, or defamation and can always be processed and prosecuted by the law. 

 Doxing on a subjective level is different in that the law is not obvious, people steal phone numbers and pronouns (names) and will usually use this to their advantage to harass a woman, and will mostly just victimize famous people or females.

 This insight into this law is intended to dive into a level of criteria for a lawmaker to sift through to provoke a lawful act to make this state of criminal activity illegal.

 In absolute terms, choice is presented and processed by the victim to press charges, though investigation will always be needed to process fake or fraudulent ID or random numbers on a cell phone. Fake number apps should be considered bannable by the government to safely keep this law in affect and effective.

 Stalkers and creeps, cretins and heathens and secular individuals with less morals disobey social queues and cross boundaries that prevent others from enjoying their life fully, which may cause trauma and social anxiety, fear, paranoia, and untrustworthy feelings towards the opposite sex (females point of view).

 Men with pathologies stemming from childhood abuse and cluster b personality disorder, which includes psychological abuse and sexual trauma usually have some sort of social dysfunction that creates social abuses that prevent others form being happy, causing turmoil in relationships and other forms of abuse that cyclically attach to the other forms of person(s) through various delusional senses of self in their lives, cause severe problems for humanity, but mostly in American psychiatric terms, which sanity proves is insane at this given point in history, since through these terms we know they have been abusive at the hands of the cluster b model as if it was ever their role to play in any detail to egoically and intrustively deny someone or a person their rights as a human. 

 (I (josh) personally, am on a committal which subverts my rights into the psychiatric system and provides no alleviation on what my actions occur to be since they are holding myself hostage by law and provide no insight into why i need to be committed in the first place, proves how seriously deranged these people get. Psychiatry is the worse option to treat mental health, which they believe should sustainably become forever and eternally a problem through their own belief in delusions.)

 Laws that are in effect and cause this insight into law to correlate in antagonism should always be refuted because men don’t have that much control over themselves to act sanely in ways that women need, and though these women trust some men, these men that attack the women through subjective doxing cause severe problems in society, it is not a new option to continue these discussions as if women have not been murdered or threatened or double binded through belief to be killed by these men.

 The laws in my city (cedar rapids, ia) have subverted themselves to be worse for the women here than the men and peace is obviously not on spot. Even though my interactions with women often prove these men to be insane, because they threaten the women with histrionic attacks and harassment, it causes severe otherworldly guilt on my end to even come into contact with someone of the female gender (no trans), and several hundred women have been murdered by the city to befriend the thought that they had to somehow keep up with me, sexually, socially or otherwise, because of JEREMY DANIEL DAVIS PEACOCK (in all sanity this person is this person’s name). HE is a con artist, man, boy, what-have-you, and accuses myself of being him or some other delusional snake oil that he fed the federal government to provoke others to do his bidding, enact his will, and defy social boundaries to believe he is somehow sane enough to make political decisions in the interim or for any reason at all.

 If there is a riot, there should be national guard prevention to non lethally take control of the situation and provide asylum for the buildings and people in the city, although not a police state, the governor would have to enact peacekeeping through the national which no one would be able to prevent as a safe way of rioting.

 Peaceful protests include; yelling, throwing non lethal objects that pose gags on the humor of the situation like tomatoes, although can be assault and battery by law against a peacefully approachable officer, but in a riot this has already happened, and the police started it. Or a hockey game or a black man died and people cannot control their anger as if rage manifested into their psyche and they can stockholm their herd mentality and no longer fit into and individual sentience and identify as a herd of people rioting, though and individual can proclaimed the progenitory predator of the situation that caused it, through a violent act or social manipulation, there are reasons misunderstanding causes all conflict and evidence proves the sane act of starting a riot and may or may not end up being right or wrong in the united states of america. NO matter what side you're on, government or not, the people aren't always correct, that is to say, what the government enacts may not be good for everyone, and when the majority disagrees, the sanest thought is that the government is wrong. When the government is wrong about anything, no one is usually held accountable until the president is alleviated of duty and mostly we don't punish them because they were in charge; if, for instance there was someone in charge, immune to international national identification there would be serious implications on what a country could and couldnt do, but within the law stated as natural within that system of lawfully agreed upon sanity by the government or vice versa by the people, and if that person were to side with one or the other, there would be no legal consequences other than a redaction of law to provide less obtrusive perversion of human rights and on my turquoise tier 2 consciousness i understand no one else but myself knows within sane law and without some form of egoic attachment to power and impartiality in lawful terms through mediation and professionalism of how law presents itself to be turquoise but not selflessly identified as wrong ad hoc, simply stated as facts, for what a person deserves fully and not seflishly because need ot be respected and loved and aware of why that may not have always been simple for us and why we should forgive ourselves and those before us becuase they were our ancestors and we will, right now, prove we can be better than them because we have always been look back at history, instead of forwardly and without provocation because of greed and wealth hoarding, with a trickle down pyramid economy that may not always work for the poverty stricken and upwards because of lack of initiative. Chinese socialism works better for others and is mostly fair to sane and non criminally insane thinkers that provoke the law and stop others from being truthful within their purpose.