The Original Input for the Output Details Regarding All Unified Political Theory

 Unificationism, a political theory that espouses a system of governance centered around unity, peace, and equity, presents a distinctive approach to political thought. Its proponents posit that governments should prioritize the collective well-being of all citizens, transcending political divisions and vested interests.

Unificationism shares certain commonalities with both socialism and commonwealth unified political theories and systems. It aligns with socialism in its emphasis on collective ownership and control of resources, as well as the equitable distribution of wealth and power. This focus on shared resources seeks to ensure that all citizens have access to essential goods and services, thereby fostering a more just and inclusive society.

However, Unificationism extends beyond these shared principles, setting itself apart with several distinctive qualities. Firstly, it places great importance on individual self-unity, recognizing that internal harmony is a prerequisite for achieving unity on a societal level. This emphasis on personal transformation suggests that Unificationism is not solely concerned with structural changes but also with cultivating a culture of peace and harmony within individuals.

Another distinctive feature of Unificationism is its proposed Credits System Theory, which addresses the challenges of currency and poverty. This theory posits an alternative economic system that seeks to eliminate the problems associated with traditional fiat currencies. By implementing a credit-based system, Unificationism aims to create a more equitable distribution of wealth, reduce financial disparities, and promote economic stability.

Furthermore, Unificationism underscores the significance of disseminating awareness about peace and unity. It recognizes that creating a unified and peaceful society requires not only political and economic reforms but also a shift in consciousness. By actively promoting education and dialogue around these themes, Unificationism seeks to cultivate a shared understanding of the importance of unity and cooperation, fostering a sense of global community.

In sum, Unificationism stands as a thought-provoking political theory that challenges conventional notions of governance. Its emphasis on individual self-unity, the Credits System Theory, and its commitment to spreading peace and unity set it apart from other theories. While Unificationism is still in its early stages of development, it offers a fresh perspective on how societies can be organized and governed, with the potential to contribute significantly to political thought and practice.

Intelligence in unified theory is a value and not a luxury. It doesn’t require a smart person to be intelligent and it doesn’t require an intelligent person to allow stupidity around them. Although there is a series of delusions surrounding communism, there would always have been in the range of intelligence that cannot think politically, after all it is a monetary critique of the materialist culture brought on by capital greed and worthless gains in power. Although it takes several misunderstandings to reach a point where peace is an option, it doesn’t always require anything but a choice. If a system is wrong, it is only such. If it is right, it succeeds.

Unificationism is a system of law based on education, free or not, what you are educated in is your profession, while what you work to make money is your education based on your efforts from what you are educated in, such as the difference between what high school and previously has taught a person vs was a government already knew, there were times where linear process was never working and the status quo would always change. If there were no stifling of free speech it was a toss between power and correctness, oftentimes correct is never wrong to the wrong in power and will always guilt trip the powerful figure-head into submission as long as they are not threatened against their own will to survive to see the change.

Preemptive assumption about the facts of political systems is often just the social outcome from progress, and although a person may never disagree with progress, they would often have to be more aware of why they oppose it in the first place than why they would resist it to begin with as change is often a scary topic for those that believe they are right.

If 100% of a capital gain is a profit there is no work and there is no product and there is no object to sell, and then there is no happiness. If monetary wealth is an earning of more happiness, then the term happiness has to be defined by what makes us happy. If there were a chance that anything we buy makes us happy, why would we buy it to make us happy? What would help us is making an attempt at challenging our mental state and as to why we were unhappy to begin with, which is not a conundrum but the social sciences have been studying these things for centuries. If a political system were to place basic education systems in place internationally that were not subversive to the power system and the power system were told it is only offensive if you are wrong, there would be only progress.