The original writ of social harassment

For the sake of theory and an example of scale, suggested adding context to- a high profile citizen or name, previously known, socially spoken for, social criteria unknown by the imminent [new] victim under the assumption the person knows mentioned (defamed) victim [the person spoken for before met [unless hired by assistance or aid, with expectation under legality based on official title or company ID, believed to be the only situation that would not be opportunistic (also check for opportunistic speech)]] 

Under mentioned psychological criteria such as: Narcissistic Tactics; always check “flying monkeys, intrusive speech (attacks on self control, as in a social lack of consent to not speak to them), and gaslighting.

Definition of Social Harassment: Entailed As Further on As a Break of Law Under Social Misunderstanding, through a Defamation Process Inflicted by Another of Basic Understanding of the Person Mentioned through the Basic Premise of the Informal Phrase “He said, She Said”:

Under a pretense: The Perpetrator would always have met the victim, would give gossip credence in a social aspect through harassing language that causes others to believe a lie about the person through tactic called Gaslighting in Psychology and through a double bind of Gaslit individuals both parties in social potential (ie anyone told through gaslighting; and the victim) would always become liable in social delusion (as in no truth is spoken about the person, through cleverness, not intelligence (such as social intelligence, emotional intelligence, unlawful thinking, or lawful thinking in regard to social function as far as the outcome of the social experience endured by parties affected): 

Definition: (you can include any narcissistic tactics-*)

Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that involves manipulating someone into questioning their own reality, thoughts, and feelings. The goal is to make the victim question their own perceptions and instincts, and eventually convince them that the gaslighter's version of events is the truth. 

Gaslighting can happen in any relationship, including between friends and family, and can be a very effective way for the abuser to gain control. It's often subtle at first, with the gaslighter changing small details in stories or memories. Over time, the victim can become confused, anxious, isolated, and depressed, and may lose all sense of what's actually happening. 

Some examples of gaslighting include: 

Denying facts: The gaslighter denies the situation or the victim's feelings and needs. 

Questioning memory: The gaslighter questions the victim's memory of events, even if they remember them accurately. 

Blocking or diverting: The gaslighter changes the subject or questions the victim's thoughts. 

Trivializing: The gaslighter makes the victim's needs or feelings seem unimportant. 

Forgetting or denial: The gaslighter pretends to have forgotten what happened or denies things like promises made to the victim.

Certain criteria manifest from Social Harassment; Such as from a rested state only to prevent death: The basic premise is that you end up doubting others and do not trust life (under philosophical term) anymore:

Doubting Yourself

Doubting Reality

Doubting Your Loved One(s)

Doubting your Friend(s)

Doubting any Relationship with an Individual victim

Doubting why life was ever in your control on a normative level

Doubting Authority’

Doubting why the Law can’t do anything about it or these following criteria of social impacts following and event under these mentioned documented criteria here and previously(past tense, out of this document and and relatable to society at a whole system:

Assault

Violent Assaults

Assertive Intrusive Language (leading to insane feelings)

Deaths

Sexual Assault

Intrusive Language 

Coercive Rape [non-negotiable] (a woman may have to have sex to survive under a non consensual bias)

Homelessness

Sadistic Assault

Harassment

Sadistic Harassment

Collective Social Misunderstanding; Such as Racism, Nationalism (no pride in your Government) Clan Warfare (within a social system such as a government or on a lower level of hierarchy, such as groups with opposing beliefs or dogmas)

Monetary Superiority- through immoral perception or insane offense of character of a “well-off” monetary social status as person [sic], or a person with more money than another person, such as in individual or group, despite intelligence level, mentioned above within 

Social Superiority, despite belief or factual nature of superiority; Such as ‘Fame’; Such as education; Such as power over other; 

Delusions of Grandeur often cause the serious belief that one is superior despite proof of social status not adding up; Such as received inheritance (as in no work done for social status); Intellectual capacity (such as the termed phrase ‘stupid vs. intelligent’, in vise versa ‘ignorant vs. aware’, and ‘knowledgeable vs. uneducated’

National Superiority; Bad Leadership (under government), Immoral Leadership (apparent government (non-bias, secular observance, i.e. Reasoning of deaths, Reasoning of military (presence, method, inhumane action, brutal force, and other rough methods of using power to inflict a leadership role. 

Professional Superiority, Degreed Knowledge Superiority, Vehemency in Practice (such as malpractice or degree of knowledge failure, in social aspects of Tactics mentioned in Definition of: Social Harassment, Previously) Enacted through bias from Degree of knowledge to impose will onto another, through untruth of intent while displaying no remorse (in hierarchy of misbehavior and unlawful thinking.)

Discrimination from degree of knowledge in power, unto other, suggesting superior intellect based on degree of (potential) knowledge despite knowing under oath t

hat one is wrong in directive (usually used by power authority.)