A Peaceful Conclusive Reason$

Criminal Lobbying and American Politics



Lets start by assuming all people are created equal. If they are created equal they should be treated equally, correct? True or false: A person is as good as the money they have? False.
If a person has $1,000, they either have a job or they were given the money. If they have rent, they will pay at least half of that in one month. Good does not equate what that person is, it equates how that person behaves. If their actions prove they are better for others than themself because theyre a morally good and driven person with a past that prevents them from being in a position of wealth simply because they are in debt, it doesn’t equate “bad”.
When a person who is “bad” has money, they will always act out what that implies, simply because they are morally driven to be worse.
Morals are primarily genetic, but are consciously acted out as a subconscious form of thinking leading to action that reflects the thought process reflected by how they think and how they feel, outwardly as an action.
As offensive as a “bad” person is, they always find a way to step on others and force them into slavery, mentally (legally too; thanks psychiatry).
Reiterating how the definiton of Good proclaims Bad, the definitions create dichotomies, and as embarrassing as it seems there are several definitions for each. If you search in Google “good definition” it comes up with several definitions. A bad person will always see the negative implication of the noun “good”, meaning that it’s a usable object.
While a good person will see it as offensive or a good thing will come to mind like food or something practical.
The relation to good and bad is not subjective. It’s absolute, no matter how many times you question the authority of the sentence, a good person will always be good, a bad person will always be bad; more specifically if I just walk up to someone and punch them for no reason I could be called a bad person, arguably there would be a good reason for me to do it if it was funny, but not everyone would find it funny. 
If a bad person tried this they would probably feel good about themselves and not even find it worse than how they feel, which is bad. For the sake of the argument, a good person goes unnoticed because punching someone doesn’t cross their mind. Self defense aside this is always true. Mentally balanced people would never punch someone out of psychotic rage or covert deception to believe it's funny or domineering in ways that make them better.
Imagine what a billionaire would do with their power would a president prove he was incapable of behaving himself. Would the billionaire donate millions of dollars to arbitrarily assume that that person would want to ever exist based on their opinion? Simply from an inflated ego by the chance they had billions of dollars to donate millions? 
Let’s say I ran for President with 15 bucks and made a sign that stated it clearly, it reads: “I am the President”, and during the preliminary elections when everyone debates their points I hold it up and say “I AM THE PRESIDENT”, with no points to make. Knowing the people in America, that might win.
Likened to Biden, it crosses the mind that this old bastard once and foremost decided to run for pop culture and clout to provide his ego with satisfaction and left no option but to make a machiavelian scheme simply because 1. He wanted to. or 2. Someone told him to, or 3. Someone hired him to.
Biden was never a very acutely law inspiring individual, he was and always will be a racist. He, back in the grainy days of film and dirty colored black hair with no bologna patches coming in, told us that he believes in segregation. This implicatively declines society into a real situation where the president is racist and feeds off of the black population, creating a situational awareness where he used the African population to win the election.
Not only is the black vote important, it’s one of the most sought after aspects of an election, because its a swing vote and red states contain the most lazy individuals, causing the democratic blue states to vote for the guy who claims he’s into black people because they empathize on a level that they believe serves the black population. So we have on one hand, the racist red states supressing the black voters, and the yankee blue states causing the dilemma that the blue president is somehow a good person even though he incited the black population to vote for him because the Red president was painted as a Nazi but Biden is just a racist white supremecist, and Trump just like a superior individual is just sane to think the black population is full of free loaders and silver platter complexes that cause our lazy problems in red states to begin with.
No matter what we cause our thinking to assume about race, there are only small reasons race isn’t important, and that all races are equally different but not even close to being superior to eachother unless you compare societies and technology and culture. In which case we see who is best.
Lazy people exist and this points to a bigger problem. Lazy thinking is a real process to work through collectively, some people are lethargic while others have ADHD and some are addicted to amphetamines and cocaine and some opioids. 
Lazy thinking causes people to take things for granted, lazy research leads to problems in science and research should never be blanket cased with half assed lobbying to cover up the truth unless of course we think about how free information may hurt others, such as medical knowledge and quantum mechanics and egoic identity. Bad things happen, please observe sane and thoughtful research when observationally inclining yourself to understand knowledge, as Rakim said “know the ledge"


Legal Definitions of Morality
Facts prove moral science.
Facts prove empathy.
Facts prove good behavior pays off.
Conjecture proves bad people succeed always.
Complacent thinking and behavior proves inaction is unresolved conflict of interest in fear through herd mentality.
Ethics prove we should do something about it.
The worst people are the morally decrepit dejected sheeple.
Sheep = inactive stupid people
Morally driven people are better.
Righteousness proves pride and ego.
Self actualized people know they’re right.
Righteousness proves nothing but hypocrisy.
Complacent hypocrisy causes misunderstanding and wars.
Love does not cause wars. EGO and SELF RIGHTEOUS thinkers do.
People need to fucking die.
NO ONE IN FLAT SENTENCE NEEDS TO LIVE.
THE WHOLE PLANET WILL EXPLODE OR EXTINCT ITSELF IN TIME.
If there was a reason to morally decline ourselves into murderous rampage we probably already learned that lesson as ape like creatures in the past. Die. Please just be nice to yourselves.